Case Note: Landscapes Unlimited, et al. v. Lexington Ins. Co.
In Landscapes Unlimited, et al. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84465 (D. Neb. 2006), a Nebraska federal judge examined the meaning of the phrase “values at risk” in a flood deductible...
View ArticleLouisiana Judge Rules on Katrina Insurance Coverage Cases
On November 27, 2006, Judge Stanwood R. Duval Jr. issued his long awaited decision as to insurance coverage for water damage and flooding following the levee breaches during Hurricane Katrina.
View ArticleEighth Circuit Vacates Previous Decision and Finds No Coverage for Trade Embargo
After first reversing a decision finding coverage, the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals vacated its previous decision and issued an opinion on October 13, 2006, declaring that a food company’s loss...
View ArticleCase Note: Weiler v. Union Insurance Company
In the unpublished opinion of Weiler v. Union Insurance Company, the Nebraska Court of Appeals considered whether the terms of an insurance policy required the insurer to replace the siding on an...
View ArticleFirm Defends Gulf Insurance in Policy Dispute With Hartford
The Superior Court, County of Norfolk, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, ruled in favor of Gulf Insurance Co.'s motion for summary judgment and declared that Gulf has no duty to share the costs of a...
View ArticleY2K Remediation Efforts Excluded From Coverage
General Telephone and Electronics Corp., now Verizon, recently lost its claim for a $381 million reimbursement for Y2K expenses when the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey granted a...
View Article
More Pages to Explore .....